Our other tube sites:

Search results for : (5) Nonprofit
Discover Kauai; Prosecutorial Abuses Exposed
  • Author: Pinkerton1
  • Views: 3246 views
  • Rating:
  • Category: Nonprofit
  • Prosecutors must disclose obviously exculpatory evidence even absent a request from the defendant, and when Guyot interfered with a court order in an attempt to prevent the court ordered penal liability exam from potentially exonerating Pinkerton, and to suppress the question of Pinkertons liability from a court ordered mental examination is equivalent to the suppression of evidence, along with suppressing exculpatory evidence found on Pinkertons website, are grounds that disqualify him for immunity. See Brady v. Maryland373 U.S. at 87 Prosecutor Guyot and members of the County of Kauai Prosecutors Office have a professional responsibility to divulge the evidence favorable to the Plaintiff, when they learned from Pinkerton's website and failed to allow that information to negate Pinkerton's guilt, regardless if the evidence implicated several Kauai Police Officers. Once again, no sanctions were ever brought against the Prosecutors Office or Guyot for with violating Rule 3.8(b) of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct. Rule 3.8. of the Hawaii Rules of Professional Conduct: Performing the duty of the public prosecutor or other government lawyer. A public prosecutor or other government lawyer shall: (a) not institute or cause to be instituted criminal charges when [the prosecutor or government lawyer] knows or it is obvious that the charges are not supported by probable cause; and b) make timely disclosure to the defense of all evidence or information known to the prosecutor that tends to negate the guilt of the accused or mitigates the offense, and, in connection with sentencing, disclose to the defense all unprivileged mitigating information known to the prosecutor, except when the prosecutor is relieved of this responsibility by a protective order of the tribunal. [emphasis added]" [Pages 9,10,11 of http://www.kpinkerton.com/08-00222/11-1.pdf ]
    Save Kauai Monkeypod Grove
  • Author: fotogail
  • Views: 665 views
  • Rating:
  • Category: Nonprofit
  • this is so outrageous... and urgent. We learned about massive development in the Poipu and Koloa area of Kauai. The planned luxury vacation homes and mega mall sounded like the continued de-hawaiianization of the islands. Then we found out the local people are accepting of the general plan, but furious about the specifics. The plans for a huge shopping mall in historic Koloa town did not include the magnificent monkeypod trees there that define the old town. The planning commission let this slip through by "missing" a deadline so that they could say it was not their fault, and the property owner was able to get a court to back a massive plan that should have been against the local guidelines. These guys are out protesting with the thinnest hope that the plan can be halted. If you have a minute to email the local papers, or the developer of the project, that could tip the balance. They know the issues -- just a line or so that you are outraged that "high-end" development of a place like Koloa, Kauai would not honor and make use of the fine old grove of trees rather than cutting most of them down might tip the balance. It's not even like the locals are asking for a park or preserve, just artful exploitation, frankly! Developer David Nelson, drnelson@neljhu_bftv56tsoncos.com (UPON EDIT: the funky-looking email address from their handout was wrong. Try either dnelson@nelsoncos.com or if that bounces, drnelson@nelsoncos.com -- or phone the Nelson Companies Inc in Michigan (248) 539-9020 Media: letters@kauaipubco.com and letters@honoluluadvertiser. com The chainsaws start January 2 unless somebody sends that little email that finally tips the balance towards sanity and restraint.